Dear Speaker Pelosi, and Sen. Klobuchar (attn: Kali Cruz),
The attached chart comparing defining characteristics of the Bush administration’s covert operation targeting me for extermination to practices used by other totalitarian regimes (e.g. Nazis, Communists, Iran). I included examples from my deceased advisor’s experience as a German-Jew before escaping the Nazis, both to illuminate what aspects of genocide he avoided, but I experienced in the USA. While there are remarkable similarities to the Nazi’s sequential extermination process, I believe the Bush administration’s use of its “secret legal powers,” is better characterized as a “Covert Hybrid Totalitarianism”(e.g. the process that Hitler obtained dictatorial power, and Nazi-Germany’s market-based society, but the importance of ideology, and thus psychology in the USSR). The Watergate examples illustrate how trivial the “worst abuses of executive power,” were back before- when there wasn’t a secret Constitution to suspend the one used for photo ops- and the Bush administration didn’t require extra power to protect us from totalitarian terrorists…
It’s revealing that possibly the most brilliant creative energy in the Bush administration was devoted to their use of secret executive powers to coerce/deceive mostly liberal UC-Berkeley/SF Bay citizens, doctors, and corporations to execute the most brutal extermination attempt of an “intellectual terrorist” (i.e. Democrat who called their bluff) in the history of any democracy.
My next update will include a graphical depiction of “networked extermination & torture,” which amplifies American’s obedience to authority revealed in the Milgrim study (50+% willing to torture to death an innocent person w/o any coercion) by using legal coercion (100% willing to comply & remain silent), but reduces the psychological trauma & information feedback (i.e. knowledge of torture/extermination process) amongst citizen-torturers (free labor) by “networking” the process across time, space, and manifold pre-existing relationships.
In addition, I’ll be distributing a scientific survey, which will be important for two reasons. First, it’ll allow me to probe into the incomprehensible gullibility & anti-scientific mode of thinking many liberals revealed when confronted with empirical claims, which contradicted their- apparent- faith in Big Broth Bush’s “love” for them. Second, by getting confirmation of some basic logical statements (e.g. if an expert attorney witnesses a criminal conspiracy, and has no self-interest in the case, which is supported by documentation, then the allegation is highly credible), I will have an easier time walking people through the difficult process of confronting an empirical phenomena that contradicts their axiomatic assumptions about what is possible in the US (e.g. attorney confirmed a criminal conspiracy by government employees to deliberately deny me access to food stamps- after 1.5 years of aggressive depletion of survival options- and also confirms that SFGOV workers’ actions constituted a criminal conspiracy to conduct an egregiously fraudulent civil rights investigation about the 1st conspiracy, and as like many similar acts, this required Pres. Bush’s “war on terror” powers, which he used- in the SFGOV’s food stamp office- to deliberately starve a non-threatening “intellectual terrorist”). Or, “On average, do elected representatives answer nearly all letters from constituents?” Of course, therefore, a response rate of 3/300 (1%) over 3 years, is conclusive evidence that some US security agency is prevented elected officials from receiving important information relevant to doing their job.
I’d like to remind you that I would have already starved to death over a year ago, if I had not found a sponsor to my “Anne Frank” survival strategy (I’d lost maybe 80lbs). Unlike Anne Frank’s whose desire to be remembered was fulfilled, the memory of me has been effectively obliterated in nearly every former colleague, friend, and half my family members. In their minds, I am as good as dead, and most them probably believe the brilliantly constructed narrative (confirmed in a mountain of fabricated records that I’ve been unable to challenge), that my death/disappearance was my fault. I’d also like to remind you that I will convincingly demonstrate that every single hour of every single day that my abuses continue to be ignored, constitute deliberate acts of psychological torture by those responsible.
If a powerful military leader repeatedly raped a woman for 3 years, while he authorized a similar operation to ensure that no one would every believe her, and she was in the identical position that I am, I doubt anyone would suggest, as Ms. Cruz did, “How do you know you can’t get a job at McDonalds,” the day after she’d indicated that there was nothing Sen. Klobuchar could do to help me.
I can assure you that when I’m done filling in these charts with 3 years of evidence, you’re going to see the first totalitarian tribal terrorism & torture orgy to ever grace the soil of a democracy.
Empirically, legally, and technically, I’ve been subjected to US military warfare tactics for 3 years. No investigation, no intent to “capture” or charge, or even acknowledge 2+2=4. At least Soviet dissidents knew the risks of opening their mouths, and knew why they were sent to the Gulag. I had to reverse-engineer America’s first-ever “virtual gulag,” and inductively determine that “secret legal powers,” were required, but still have no indication that I had any alternative to dying in isolation, after my memory had been exterminated from the all the minds of those who knew me and in my historical records, which had been replaced with ones cooked up by someone in Pres. Bush’s torture dungeon workshop.
Christopher M. Tucker (June 15, 2009)
Chart: Pres. Bush Covert Uses of “Secret Executive Powers”: Hybrid Totalitarianism Combining Hitler’s Nazi Regime & Communist Dictatorships (USSR, China, N. Korea)
| | Nixon administration’s Watergate covert operation targeting Daniel Ellsberg | · Bush administration’s covert operation (permanently discredit & exterminate) targeting UC-Berkeley colleague (Tucker) of Pres. Bush’s Anti-Terror[i] Architects (Kroenig & Yoo) · Tentative Hypothesis: Feb. 2006 memo (still classified) Zelikow’s Relevance (see my blog) | Adolf Hitler’s Nazi-Germany operation to exterminate “inferior races,” targeting those like Tucker’s PhD. advisor (Haas), who escaped to the USA before sent to Death Camp | Communist Regimes (USSR, People’s Republic of China), N. Korea (some examples from Iran) |
| Constitutional or Legal Basis of Totalitarian Power | · Pres. Nixon attempts to claim “national security” executive powers rejected | · “Enabling Acts”: secretly approved by Bush administration lawyers in the USDOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel (post 9/11-2009) without knowledge of Congress, Pres. Bush obtained dictatorial powers using largely “legal” means if he deemed them necessary to “war on terror” · Pres. Bush’s lawyers waited until end of 2nd term (Jan. 15th, 2009) to reject legal reasoning of memos, which lost force for government that had been appointed (Pres. Obama) | · Enabling Act Gesetz zur Behebung der Not von Volk und Reich ("Law to Remedy the Distress of the People and the State") passed on March 23, 1933, through which Adolf Hitler obtained dictatorial powers using largely legal means. · It carried a four-year sunset clause (and would also have lost force should another government have been appointed) but was renewed in 1937, 1941 and 1944. | · Lenin & Vanguard of Proletariat · Stalin Centralizes Power in himself · Khrushchev: criticizes Stalin’s attacks on loyal party elite |
| Continuum: Genuine Commitment to Constitutional ‘Checks & Balances’ vs. -Dictatorial Power Individual Liberties & Freedoms Protect From Tyranny of Dictator, or Majority? Use of military & secret police to attack political opponents? | · In past, when US Constitution, contained “checks & balances” proposed operation to “totally incapacitate” Ellsberg was rejected by Nixon administration (e.g. tempting suggesting Mr. Cheney/Rumsfeld, but legally too risky) · Watergate Illegal Break-in to Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s office is now legal with Patriot Act (for investigations; but, if really want to do some discrediting, powers exist in secret legal memos…ssh | · Officially: of course · Actually: SECRET LEGAL MEMOS: JUSTIFY EXTERMINATION & TORTURE OF CRITICS VIA FORMULA USED BY NAZIS/SOVIETS · (A) Subordination of 1st Amendmentè critics reclassified as “invading armies,” è enemies on US soil possess sub-human legal status; (B) Subordination of 4th Amendment (& “even broader powers”)è justifies seizure/searches (e.g. property, contracts, records, ideological purging) + (C) Domestic use of US militaryè allows use of covert agents, cyber-war, communications-warfare, psychological operations, and offensive utilization of entire Anti-Terror apparatus’ legal & technical capacity (e.g. critic deemed terrorist, subjected to offensive warfare w/o rights to challenge; operational objective to discredit, and thus covert is only constraint) | · Jews & other “impure/inferior” races stripped of German citizenship · Overt sub-human legal status demarcated by mandatory wearing of yellow Jewish Star | · As defined by Bush administration official, David Rifkin, “I take for granted living in a democratic society where the individual is valued, and no one — including the government — is above the law…I grew up in the Soviet Union.. Individual’s interests were always subordinated to the whims of the state, government was the law... Stalin's Russia, and they knew real fear…every day…fear of the state and its agents….would cart them off to the Gulag…” - David B. Rivkin Jr. (October 2004) The National Review, article defending Pres. Bush’s “culture-of-life” values as central to his “war on terror” |
| Ideology & Approach to Science, Tolerance of political criticism Instrumental use of ideology or “True Believer” | · Ideological Protectionism ‘light’ | · Unprecedented suppression & politicization of science, and intelligence to support instrumental ideology & industry allies, esp. global warming, dismissing need to “change way of life” · “War on Terror” is foundation, used to formally justify extraordinary expansion of executive power, informal bullying w/ belligerent nationalism; right-wing Christian “culture of life” and “freedom” & liberty favorite catch-words · Instrumental use of ideology (science used to keep oil demand high, “war on terror” used to disingenuously invade Iraq, intimidate Congress/citizens, media during massive power grab; massive w/ no-bid contracts to war contractor allies, and secure long-term private access to oilè feed high demand sustained by ideology of climate change denial; Christianity & “life,” democracy, freedom are “branding”; core myths are source of power &- like Nazi/communist- requires violent suppression (suspected torture in destroyed videos) & “big lie” propagandaè anyone debunking myths is attacked as if enemy of US (Joe Wilson/Plame, Sibel Edmonds, Hans Blix, Scott Ritter, Phil Donahue, Dan Rather, Dick Cheney blamed Richard Clarke in June 2009 for failing to detect Al Qaeda threat…and still gets away with it; Bush administrations core myths categorically debunked by covert operation against Chris Tucker) | · Politicization of science to justify foundation of Nazi ideology (Eugenics, racial superiority · Nazi ideology not self-legitimating è requires oppression, “big lie” propaganda to “subsidize” power source · Instrumental use or “True Believer” in Nazi ideology (Hitler genuinely hated Jews) | · Politicization of science to justify foundation of Communist ideology (eventually, maturing population of social scientists enhance self-knowledge, self-reflexive impulse) · Communist ideology not self-legitimating è requires oppression, “big lie” propaganda to “subsidize” power source · Instrumental use or “True Believer” in communist ideology (Lenin yes, Stalin much less) |
| Empirical Indicators: Sub-human legal status | | · (Tucker) sub-human denied rights of worst “human” American criminals (e.g. rapists. murderers) · illegal-aliens, (e.g. illegal-alien child molesters)[ii]: · Terrorist detainees (e.g. medical care not used to harm detainees; force feeding of detainees vs. forced starvation of Tucker) · Animals (e.g. dog fighting/cruelty laws) | Nazi Legalization of Extermination | · Formal equality · Ethnic minorities, Jews would disagree |
| · Due Process, Equal Protection | Yes | · No trial for Tucker · No right to have sub-human status even acknowledgedè can’t challenge sub-human status that is officially denied, or “proxy” violations (due to officially denied sub-human status): this sub-type of “threat” classification: anyone aware is legally proscribed from acknowledging it or it as reason for abuse, or non-standard treatment (see Orwellian implications)[iii] · Useless: appeals to reason, evidence · Unlike more “fair” forms of political brutality in USSR, Iran, N. Korea- where political criticism is known risk- I had no rational expectation that political criticism was threat to my life, given it was my job, and I said nothing unreasonable, compared to Nazi hate mongers, Bill O’Reilly who invited terrorists to bomb San Francisco, or Pat Robertson who blame hurricane Katrina disaster on victims (rather than, Pres. Bush) for the moral depravity of city, gays, atheists, etc.[iv] | · No trial for Jews · Overt reason for status · No right to legally challenge sub-human status, due to race, ethnic-based classification (maybe falsely labeled gays could) · Useless: appeals to reason, evidence | · Overt risk of criticizing Stalin, dissidents are aware of dangers · (see my blog on Iran’s treatment of Roxana Saberi vs. US mistreatment of me; espionage charge not unreasonable given facts · N. Korea: American journalists, after crossing border, given trial, charged w/ actual crime, however harsh sentence, can’t definitively say they’re innocent, or weren’t given trial & charged |
| Material Extraction Before Biological Extermination | · NA | · No right to contracts, property, denied right to legal representation against in private proxies, who’ve violated contract/rights on behalf of US operation, no right to obtain- or have corrected- my own records[v] · Confiscation of property “war” authority used to coerce private corporations, state/local governments to violate contracts & laws; Tucker’s material belongings targeted an material support of enemy (e.g. US cyber-attack incapacitates laptop, Dell refuses to honor warrantee for 3 years, forcing me to charge 2nd laptop, w/ similar results) · Results: quickly depleted financial assets, transportation, loss of housing | · No right to contracts, property, · Denied right to legal representation against private proxies, who’ve violated contract/rights on behalf of Nazi party, · Confiscation of property for state or loyal party members · Results: depletion of financial assets, transportation, loss of housing | · No right to private property, · State central planning, “collectivization,” etc. |
| Racial/Ideological “cleansing” of professions -Blacklisting -Denied Employment -Denied access to government assistance or unemployment insurance (citizens only) | | · Covert: (secretly legal for Pres. Bush) purge from academia, employment, permanent career damage, professional reputation sabotage, defamationè “secretly legal” to fabricate records to depict “purge” as all my fault (e.g. EU trip to NEWGOV obstructed, spoofed emails of terminated project; see blog on UC-Berkeley purge) | · Overt: legally purged from Employment & Profession: | · Overt/Informal: Dissidents blacklisted, from professions, schools, employment · party loyalty determines access to employment & career mobility · (also-totalitarian religious fundamentalist: loyalty oaths to religion/leader- Iran’s Ayatollah) |
| Physical Violence & Abuse: a) government policy and/or b) informal/unofficial c) refusal to protect from private violence | · Nixon administration rejected proposed “total incapacitation” | · Violent mugging of laptop with pepper spray (extremely suspicious circumstances)[vi] · Egregious denials of victims of violent crime assistance, even during year after identity exposed by SFPD to gangsters, who’re armed when I lead cops to them · SJPD staged intimidation (predicted; confirmed staged, adds to discrediting paper trail) · Threats of homelessness if I didn’t destroy evidence of own abuse · Egregious medical abuse, denials of insurance, | Prof. Haas (advisor) beat up every day on way to school because he was Jew in pre-WWII Germany | · See Bush administration member, Rivkin quote above on his memories of USSR |
| Law & State Capacity for Social Segmentation & Isolation (unlike race-based, objective can be psychological abuse/ torture, see chart of leading causes of suicide) | | · Legal punishment if Americans associating/aiding “sub-human thought terrorist” (e.g. refusing to cooperate/maintain secrecy is “comfort/aid to invading army”) è 100% compliance · Communications- & cyber-warfare: destructive & deceptive (200-300 hard drive reinstalls multiple computers, printers, phones, mail, faxes, periods of complete incapacitation; · Results: nearly complete “solitary confinement,” near complete social isolation & inability to participate in life at all; legal nightmare, along w/ confiscated transportation, depletion of financial resources; only survived w/ sponsor of “Anne Frank” strategy; (see “virtual gulag description below): | Legal punishment if Germans associate/aid, fail to report Jews (e.g. race pollution) | · |
| Models of psychological torture & abuse a)Interrogation b) Sadism/Suicide c) Incapacitate d) Inadvertent (however, cruel, not objective) | · Sadism/Suicide · Incapacitate | · Sadism/Suicide (discredit) · Incapacitate (“learned helpless” model; US military has best psychological warfare talent in the world, no?) | · Sadistic treatment, but physical force & mistreatment is dominant (i.e. goal not psych-oriented) | · Communists across globe uses: · E.g. The Lives of Others (2007 Oscar), - character driven to suicide after years of being blacklisted by East German Stasi · Use of psychiatry by Cuba & here, China, Comparison of Soviet vs. China’s Political Psychiatry; “Orwell’s Picnic,” |
| Physical Detainment Imprisonment | · Rule of law, trial, innocent until proven guilty | · “Virtual Gulag” (now used in Communist China); intimidation, communications filtered (friends get spoofed messages, can’t reach ‘inmate’ or have forgotten, or threatened w/ legal punishment · Ideal Exception Serving Multiple Objectives: various attempts to frame dissident (e.g. Feb. 6th is most brutal) as criminal (e.g. getting jailed on fabricated crime would allow social isolation, psychological trauma of innocent in prison, discredited in minds of peers/family, legal records, confiscation of any evidence of abuse) | · Nazi’s Industrial-Age Mass Genocide · Geographical Boundaries (e.g. Jewish Ghetto in Warsaw; Auschwitz Concentration “Camps” | · USSR Gulag/Death (Stalin decimated 70% of loyal party elite, fearing threats to power) · Unofficial & Official Home Imprisonment: unofficial “Virtual Gulag” for dissidents (now used in Communist China). · Official Detainment (e.g. Gitmo; see home arrest of Suu Kyi in Myanmar, who, unlike Tucker was tried) |
| Biological Extermination Memory Extermination: (e.g. propaganda, psychological operation) Anne Frank, quote, on fear of destruction of my memory Orwell Quote on rewriting of historical record & memory | · Operation to “Totally incapacitate” (i.e. kill/brutalize) via covert “black operation” was proposed, considered, but rejected by Nixon administration · Ellsberg targeted with prospective discrediting that could’ve be used to reinforce rejected violent operation (i.e. protect Pres. Nixon’s reputation from) · Discrediting linked to specific intelligence · Covert status required to discredit · Failed immediately (Unanswered questions)[vii] · Patriot Act authorizes access to records (i.e. getting Ellsberg’s records would be legal); using them to discredit would not be; again, records insufficient, and only credible people get targeted w/ such psy-ops · Founding Father’s checks & balances & Bill of Rights was not accidentè Evil people be tempted, & Nixon[viii] | · Covert Network-Based Extermination: death appears fault of targeted dissident · Biological Extermination: starvation, medical abuse, or suicide resulting from psychological torture/warfare; expropriation of property, financial resources, terminate or prevent employment, deny access to any benefits, deny medical insurance, or coerce doctors to harm/deny treatment · Covert Role[ix] of US Government Involvement Concealed via: legal power to coerce lifelong secrecy of witnesses/proxies- each w/ knowledge of discrete “chunk” of “networked extermination,” intimidation/bullying of target, legal assistance organizations, friends/family kept at distance via communications warfare and/or threats of legal punishment for helping “enemy” · Discrediting Narrative: Textbook Profile: of operation · Orwellian Discrediting & Re-writing of “enemy” in historical/social memory : depict Tucker as “crazy,” criminal, drug addict, incompetent as teacher & employee, traitorous via discrediting narrative in fabricated records & reinforced by US intelligence in social memory of relevant support/peer groups (e.g. sabotage, defamation, rumors, spoofed, interception, manipulation of communications) · Retrospective & Prospective Discrediting Narrative Sustained via Multi-Sourced Reinforcement: a) perception-management of peers, family completed, and b) fabricated records: vast, copious, & diverse sources. I can’t obtain or correct fabricated records (e.g. UC employment & academic, financial & debt, legal, employment, medical), c) Physical consequence of operation (e.g. unemployed, penniless, psychologically traumatized, “Anne Frank” survival strategy forces living on mother’s couch, d) factually true account of my experience requires extraordinary open-mindedness. A person must be willing to believe the Bush administration was crazy enough to waste resources, and political legacy in order to execute the most brutal KGB covert operation in history of democracies on a single PhD student w/ no links to terrorism, e) although my factually true account is internally consistent, and evidence is unambiguous, the truth immediately sounds like “crazy” paranoid story; the facts that psychological assessment criteria presuppose American patients live in stable democracy with robust legal rights, thus, governmental entities engaged in coordinated abuse are protected by a methodological fortress (i.e. victims of government abuse are-by definition-scored as paranoid; one wonders if Soviet diagnostic methodology made the same assumption…) · Successful Extermination of My Memory (i.e. I have already died in the minds of nearly all former social acquaintances & most of my family. No one attempted to scientifically assess the evidence, but many/most assume that I was to blame for conditions that were caused by totalitarian brutality) · Pre-Packaged Narrative for “accidental” Death: despite 100’s of letters, I’ve been unable to get a single record changed or official acknowledgement, except for 2 denials under Bush administration; I’m effectively “detained” w/o rights, or unfiltered communications. The only sign of hope is that the aggressive cyber-warfare stopped, and I’m getting closer to a persuasive scientific presentation of my unbelievable experience. If Pres. Obama is going to authorize my “final solution” and have me whacked, it’ll be soon. If not, some official will have to acknowledge this case publicly b/c it’s unlikely that a publishable account of this unprecedented case gets distributed, while it’s officially ignored. | · Extermination Process: group-based (Jews) · “Gassing,” · Starvation · Death from disease, & denial of care · Medical experimentation & abuse (Mengels) · Discrediting of Jews (Propaganda source of targets: groups) | · Gulags, Siberia · Hard-Labor · Use of psychiatry by Cuba & here, China, Comparison of Soviet vs. China’s Political Psychiatry; “Orwell’s Picnic,” · Torture of dissidents (e.g. Interrogation, or sadistic, suicide, or break mind of dissident- Orwell 1984 “Room 101”; See synopsis of (2007 Oscar), The Lives of Others- character Jerska, driven to suicide after years of being blacklisted by East German Stasi; · Communist discrediting practice(source of target: influential intellectual dissidents & ethnic and/or bourgeoisie collaborators) |
[i] Non-secret legal tools: Patriot Act, Law Enforcement, Resources (e.g. Financial, Property, Food, Transportation, Mobility, Organizational Support, Psychological Warfare (Tactical, Soldier/Terrorist Morale, Population/Peer support, propaganda, public diplomacy), Cyber- & Communications warfare (Tactical, Deception, Coordination; surveillance, tracking), Investigation, Detainment Interrogation Weapons
[ii] Groups With Legal Protections Denied Tuckerè Terrorist Detainees (e.g. Prisoners at Bagram Have Right of Habeas Corpus; access to health care: are prevented of starving themselves), illegal-alien child molester in CA compensated $4 million for rights violations; Animals cruelty laws (e.g. NFL player can be jailed dog-fighting; here); murderers, rapists; Nazi criminals, Mr. Demjanjuk in US; Mock Torturers at Abu Graib (e.g. soldiers, photographed in mock torture positions, criticized as “bad apples” & jailed by Bush administration; Tortures (not photographed); Those who authorized torture & exposed covert CIA operations
[iii] Sub-type of threat is classified, integrated into “war on terror” information networks, and unlike dangerous threats, intellectual threats not intended for detainment- as it would legitimize claims of abuse- yet Americans are legally proscribed from acknowledging threat status, necessitating Orwellian lies, equivalent to 2+2=5’ nearly universal refusal to respond b/c violations can’t be denied w/ straight face, and fear of paper trail of absurd rational justifying violations)Of countless attempts at Orwellian justifications for my brutal violations, was CUIAB judge’s rejection of 2nd appeal of 2 yrs denial of unemployment, including complaint that I was being illegally being denied evidence, under cyber-warfare, confirmed by witness, decision stated that “due process,” and court as “bound to follow” law to justify violation of basic due process)
[iv] (E.g. see email to SSRC publisher- a Czech, Petra Ticha, in 2004, after she demanded I soften criticism of Bush administration, fearing consequences for SSRC. (Tucker) “Are we in USSR?” (Ticha) “This is nothing like censorship my parent’s felt under Communist regime.” (Tucker & Ticha, both wrong)
[v] (unequivocal evidence is irrelevant w/o rights vs. fabrications serving US psy-op against “enemy”)
[vi] Owner on Hayes street Café in SF that I studied at everyday & was friends w/ workers, inexplicably approached, said I was permanently banned but could not justify. I offered to pay couple bucks/day if electricity was issue, I hardly spoke. After settling at only nearby café, usually near empty, I was attacked w/ mace by guys. The first few times they scoped out laptop, I put it away, went inside. Normally, they’d move on to next café for a smaller, less athletic person. Instead they went and got pepper spray and return while later. I refused to consider possibility of government role, but in hindsight, puzzle is why that didn’t happen more often.
[vii] How to discredit a credible person w/ concrete evidence Naïve to believe Watergate burglars could’ve done much damage to credibility with his records alone. Overwhelming campaign needed to counter credibility, and make him appear “crazy” multipronged operation would’ve been necessary (e.g. depict as criminal, drug addict, traitorous, insane, violent/abusive, professional ineptitude, etc)
[viii] Watergate mystery: suspicious plane crash of related woman, who’d taken out plane insurance just before flight
[ix] 3 years (source of target: intellectual); Covert status required to discredit requires, and political realities (i.e. Bush administration was aware that executive legal powers, and operation would enrage public, and never stand up in court; keeping operation covert was paramount to keep Congress & public from learning about “secret powers” )
0 comments:
Post a Comment